Isn't it great that we have Puregraph and technical application...

Isn't it great that we have Puregraph and technical application knowledge for the cement industry. That we have very recognised partnerships that allow us to use these improvements in a targeted way (commercialisation agreement). And that it's not just about production, but also about application improvements that create real added value. Little by little, these improvements will be realised, I have no doubt about that. They are simply too good for that.
You ask whether FGR could do more about this in the USA. Certainly, why not. However, I'm happy about the partnerships in the UK and I'm happy if FGR is fully focussed there. Incidentally, it's not as unknown as you might think from your text (Leilac). Listen to this podcast (dont miss minute 41 (graphene)):
https://www.giatecscientific.com/construction-revolution/building-for-a-green-future/

CCUS, lets hope more U than S..
Well then, let them try it. Whether it makes economic sense, well. Whether storage is a solution? We hear that even hydrogen and helium find their way out of the depths... Well then, it's not our problem.
In addition to the production of clinker or cement, there are also possibilities for specific improvements, even if it is only a longer service life (concrete roads recycling concrete roads).

And the (cement) world is big. I read that recently at Cemex:
...Micronized clinker...
https://www.cemex.com/w/cemex-devel...pioneered,have validated initial R&D findings.

Well, that sounds familiar, doesn't it?

Saying: Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day, give a man a fishing rod and you feed him for life.
Or in my old analogy: L2, lagrange point , James Webb. A good idea never lets you go, just like the amazement and the memory of talent in music. (Perhaps some of you will remember a few clips that I have presented here.)

Best,
L

Translated with DeepL.com (free version)