they could well right. good to see they have gone back to the drawing board and applied some geochemistry to try and prove up an unconventional view.
If they are so convinced then IMO they need to put down as many RC holes as they can to prove the geometry.
RC will be most efficient cost wise.
if positive then go for CR and follow up DD.
they could well right. good to see they have gone back to the...
Add MAG (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
10.5¢ |
Change
-0.005(4.55%) |
Mkt cap ! $40.07M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 10.5¢ | 10.5¢ | 10.0¢ | $22.63K | 222.7K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 196490 | 10.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 10.5¢ | 19847 | 3 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 03/05/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
|
|||||
|
Last
10.5¢ |
Change
-0.005 ( 0.00 %) |
||||
| Open | High | Low | Volume | ||
| 10.0¢ | 10.5¢ | 10.0¢ | 66608 | ||
| Last updated 15.13pm 03/05/2024 ? | |||||
| MAG (ASX) Chart |