You repeatedly insinuate that I, and others, are company insiders without and evidence. I tend to find those who accuse are the one that are hiding, however, I have no evidence so i'm not going to insinuate anything. It's actually quite irritating.
You are raising some good points, but when you make comments like the software doesn't work at all when it clearly does, I could easily start saying you are down-ramping based on some good points and some blatant comments (yes I have seen your screenshot of one user.) The software DOES work, I agree the software could be improved, any startup product is a work in progress and we have seen marginal improvements over time, at no point have they stated they have reached a point where it works on phones in all lightings/angles/all cameras of all quality.
Your last 3 points are fluff. I could stretch 4 but that's definitely up for discussion and there's enough on this 4th last point to raise suspicion that we all shouldn't disregard, and others have shed light on this previously.
I feel we have discussed your first point enough now, IMO yes it would be in their interest to ensure the price of their shares are higher based on the success I hope they are projecting (and not merely their own pockets), as is the target for any Board really, as long as it is based on material benefits(not purely the revenue aspect that some seem fixated on) the shareholder wants to be informed of, and not marketing announcements (which is illegal of course).
What I have highlighted/bolded is, I think, the point of disagreement for both of us.
As a shareholder of MYQ I implore them to announce any material announcements when required per ASX listing rules as opposed to keeping us in the dark. Yoda obviously is highlighting that this can be abused and has been historically by others, and I'm sure many investors are mindful of this (if they weren't, they certainly should be now after this thread lol), certainly and well done Yoda for providing good insight to Noob investors.
But at least they have shown that the company is moving the right direction with reputable companies Some of their history certainly seems questionable as spongebob and others have raised, however one cannot simply discount the appearance that things have been changing/improving for the better.
I and others who have invested closer to the top are upset at the mistake in the research reports, it certainly paints a more concerning picture than before the retraction. I would hope investors didn't invest purely on a research report's results which now pull revenue forward a year (well god I hope not, the startup industry is no place to invest in without research), but on the agreements put in place and on the hope that they continue to lock in better deals (I am not referring to prudential, which is an interesting testing ground, but deals such as fitocracy/mayweather).
All IMO, thanks fellas. DYOR.
Expand
(20min delay)