Let me spell it out for those that don't quite understand the...

Let me spell it out for those that don't quite understand the importance of why it is good to know the 1m assays results.

From the most recent company announcement - take a look at hole BNERD0068 intercept from 259m indicated to be 18m @ 3.01g/t

It is indicated to include 15m @ 3.55g/t which means the other 3m must be 0.25g/t

But of that 15 m we don't know if it is made up of 1m of high grade and 14m of low grade

Lets assume it is made up of 2m of 25g/t and the rest is like the rest of the low grade @0.25g/t....this might still get reported as 15m @ 3.55g/t (but please do your own math)

So without seeing the 1m assays you cant actually determine whether the high grade reported nature of the 15m wide intercept is actually 15m of high grade or something less.

Maybe you would sink a pit down 259m downhole for a 15m wide intersection but most likely not on a 2m wide intersection (same ounces I know but bucket loads more tonnes of waste to move and potentially a higher risk equation of dilution on a 2m wide orebody and not a 15m wide one).

Go further down the hole to the intersection starting at 328m reported as 23m @ 1.89g/t and you will see most of that intersection is made up from 1m @ 25g/t.....not sure you would go chasing a 1m wide intersection that is over 300m deep if there is no other high grade tonnes......but early days so who knows what might get proven up.

All the above is hypothetical gobbleygook .......but as indicated by others there is no need for 1m assay information.

I hope this helps some that wish to look into assay results in greater detail.