BUD (ASX) Ann: Nestle announced as a new Buddy Ohm customer

Originally posted by broosta ↑

I never stated or implied I needed to contact BUD management or the BUD technical team. I falsely presumed, given the now historical lack of technical response from BUD posters, that ‘perhaps some kind person [could] direct me to a schematic of the Buddy ohm system or even a few detailed images of an installed system in an industrial environment like the ones described by myself or taffyduke to dispel my doubts.’

Perhaps taffyduke could enlighten me as he appeared to claim it was possible? Perhaps he might address the practical details I raised (in my other posts) in installing such units on sub circuits that needed to be isolated at and ‘connected’ at the switchboard end? Remember we are discussing brownfield or active industrial processing and not greenfield sites.

After all the issue was and remains: ‘I see no problem. in using ohm units by utilising metering in main switch rooms. Provided it occurs as part of a scheduled shut down for other production reasons. As to the dedicated circuits of a sub-board well that is a different matter….’

I’m still waiting. The closest I got from a reasonable response was a link from notlistening14 to a few BUD brochures that confirms the installation takes ‘ hours’ to install. And jsbuser’s link to a picture of a CT clamp which confirms to my mind that there must be a physical point of contact; which I described previously as: ’the first contact in the wireless chain’.

If BUD posters do not understand the implications of that detail then I wonder why they invested in BUD in the first place? It does however begin to explain why some dismiss my technical reasoning with rebuttals that lack in any substance other than emotional derision. I am pointing out a potential reality that they would prefer to ignore.

Broosta

Expand

Broosta,

I dont need to know how an internal combustion or electric engine works to invest in a car company. I merely need to evaluate the fundamentals of the company, its prospects relative to competition and the likely uptake of whatever they are proferring.

For BUD, focus on the potential outcome and benefit for the end user as an enabler for understanding their power and resource consumption in a better way. This doesnt have to be the most accurate way, just effective enough for them to make valid working decisions better than they do now. Focus on the outcome.

You sir, are asking how to make a clock when most of us just need to know the time.

Regards
John