the two entities aren't similar not at all except they both have (relatively) high management fees.
management (and performance) fees may not always detract from the returns of the funds. it doesn't matter if the funds are ETF's or LIC's.
it is commonly regarded that most ETF's will outperform LIC's and individual shares over time. the longer the timeframe the greater the chance. l have heard it said that this is due to high fees and other factors.
(I actually believe this to be correct. management fees anchor performance over the very long term).
l was suprised to see that despite the fees changed by ETF IOO (they outperform other ETF's in Australia) lower fees don't always = outperformance.
likewise the management fees of LSF (which is a LIC) are quite high - however it's SP performance has been stunning.
unrelated l know but l find it remarkable that LSF (so far..) is actually showing similar returns to the one of the best ETF in Australia despite much much higher management fees than the best ETF
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Ann: Net Tangible Asset Backing
the two entities aren't similar not at all except they both...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 5 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add LSF (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
$3.12 |
Change
-0.040(1.27%) |
Mkt cap ! $1.951B |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
$3.18 | $3.18 | $3.12 | $459.8K | 146.0K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 854 | $3.12 |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
$3.15 | 35359 | 4 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 854 | 3.120 |
2 | 7099 | 3.110 |
3 | 34098 | 3.100 |
1 | 10000 | 3.090 |
2 | 29000 | 3.080 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
3.150 | 35359 | 4 |
3.160 | 5198 | 2 |
3.170 | 10611 | 3 |
3.180 | 21495 | 2 |
3.190 | 11627 | 3 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 28/10/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
LSF (ASX) Chart |