Booker and a female with same last name, own 20 million shares...

Booker and a female with same last name, own 20 million shares collectively, so that assumption is valid, all the rest of your verbiage is assumptions you can not prove. More importantly the company has chosen not to warrant your assumptions with a like statement of disclosure, which certainly would have been appropriate, you knew to say it, or at least in keeping with the new COB's asserted stellar reputation.

All of these clouds in the capital raise, apparently needed for the company saving acquisition, is a push, pushes are risky, no one with corporate finance experience would describe it as anything other than risky.

The changes in control for JT, and his related parties, and interests, may have actually been instituted by the new Board, as a Firewall, that is how I read it.

Again this is not a wrong thing, just an up on a tight rope action. But this is where they are, SSI was a similar move.

Regarding your sophomoric and unprofessional attach on me personally, well don't you all enjoy a saying about Procreating with Arachnids, so get in with it NET.