Okay, okay, I accept the points made against consolidation. If...

Okay, okay, I accept the points made against consolidation. If we stick with the 3.5 billion shares, using the theory that they can't go any lower, it puts a floor in the price per unit. And other consolidations have only allowed the value to fall if the company is not able to keep pumping some positive data helium into the balloon. Which we'd all appreciate.

Just one point though; if the price doubles from 1c to 2c, the gain on 1,000,000 shares held is $10K. A 10% increase on 100,00 shares valued at 10c is also $10K. But yes, there has to be a financial reason for the 10% increase when you move up from cellar dweller to a minor league. Again, which we'd all appreciate.

The other thing is, no one has addressed the reason for the not insignificant volumes that spike up and down on an irregular but not infrequent basis. Would someone, from either inside or outside the company, like to have a crack at that?

And while I've got you there Gucci, rest easy. The suggestion was a personal thought; there's no insider knowledge involved