Forum:my simple observation is that these results are "good" but...

Forum:

my simple observation is that these results are "good" but not exceptional.

The grades are too low to be be knock-out results, but these drill holes are shallow so very encouraging for what may be sitting below - yes no? If nothing else these, numbers are heading in the right direction - yes/no?

Sorry to state the bleeding obvious, but to me, ARD is looking to prove up (get to) 100mt of silver equivalent.....or is the silver ounces number more important? Is 100mt the magic number to get serious interest? Or does it all depend upon the price x tonnes/ounces? For gold, the rule of thumb, is you need a million ounces to be commercial...normal times that is.

JM, I will be interested to see your results. Are there books you could recommend that I can use to teach myself how to model deposits like Kempfield?

Cheers,

HC