ENV enova mining limited

14.3%

0.8¢

Hello. The plain difference is below from two different...

First 49 Last

GKeden

7,117 Posts.

672

18/02/25

15:31

Post #: 77910554

Originally posted by jigish1922: ↑

Some interpretation of the results from EVM(first set) and PTR (second set). Note that i am not a geologist but i found this somewhere and thought it was interesting :

Key Differences
Factor TiO₂ Results (First Set) HM Results (Second Set)
Grade Range 10.1%–16.4% TiO₂ 7.1%–26.3% HM
Intercept Thickness 16.4m–67.0m 16m–28m
Depth of Mineralization From surface (0m) to ~40m From 2m–29m
Highest Grades 16.4% TiO₂ over 6m 26.3% HM over 8m
Mining Potential High-grade TiO₂ with thick intercepts High-grade HM, but needs confirmation of TiO₂ content
Interpretation of the Results
1. TiO₂ Results (First Set)
Higher TiO₂ concentration (10.1%–16.4%) directly indicates titanium-rich mineralization.
The thicker intercepts (up to 67m) suggest a large deposit.
Near-surface mineralization favors open-pit mining, reducing costs.
Likely source minerals: ilmenite and rutile (used in pigment, aerospace, and industrial applications).
2. HM Results (Second Set)
HM% measures the total heavy minerals, but not all heavy minerals are titanium-based (e.g., zircon, garnet, and magnetite may be present).
HM grades are higher (up to 26.3%) but may not fully represent TiO₂ content.
Smaller intercepts compared to the TiO₂ results, but still significant.
The high-grade zones (e.g., 8m @ 26.3% HM) suggest localized enrichment of valuable minerals.
Further mineralogical analysis is needed to confirm the TiO₂ content within the HM fraction.
Which One Is More Economically Attractive?
✅ TiO₂ Results (First Set)
More reliable indicator of titanium content.
High-grade and thick intercepts suggest economic viability.
Better understood extraction process (ilmenite/rutile beneficiation).
⚠️ HM Results (Second Set)
Potentially high-value, but TiO₂ content is unknown within the HM fraction.
Requires mineralogical studies to determine if the heavy minerals are commercially viable.
Higher grades in small intervals could mean selective mining is required.

Expand

Hello. The plain difference is below from two different quarterly reports from ILU and SFX.

Last edited by GKeden: 18/02/25

ENV Price at posting: 1.0¢ Sentiment: None Disclosure: Not Held

Upvote

0 Great analysis

Top Stories

Listen: HotCopper Wire Podcast 014 – Abu Dhabi wants to buy our 'true' oil and gas gem

Wednesday's HotCopper trends: DroneShield in Europe, Humm sale | June 25

ASX Market Close: Index flat as miners fall | June 25, 2025

BPH

Australia’s gas crisis is here – and dying coal plants aren’t helping

DEL

Delorean to begin selling carbon offsets under regulation changes

First 49 Last

Add to My Watchlist

What is My Watchlist?

A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.

(20min delay)
Last 0.8¢		Change 0.001(14.3%)		Mkt cap ! $11.66M

Open	High	Low	Value	Volume
0.8¢	0.8¢	0.7¢	$9.044K	1.196M

Buyers (Bids)

No.	Vol.	Price($)
27	43288969	0.7¢

Sellers (Offers)

Price($)	Vol.	No.
0.8¢	13094469	15

View Market Depth

No.	Vol.	Price($)
26	43048969	0.007
20	43483332	0.006
26	49726359	0.005
5	40773119	0.004
8	31589666	0.003

Price($)	Vol.	No.
0.008	13094469	15
0.009	12500799	10
0.010	6753495	14
0.011	9427730	12
0.012	4375441	8

Last trade - 16.10pm 25/06/2025 (20 minute delay)

ENV (ASX) Chart

Hello. The plain difference is below from two different...

Listen: HotCopper Wire Podcast 014 – Abu Dhabi wants to buy our 'true' oil and gas gem

Wednesday's HotCopper trends: DroneShield in Europe, Humm sale | June 25

ASX Market Close: Index flat as miners fall | June 25, 2025

Australia’s gas crisis is here – and dying coal plants aren’t helping

Delorean to begin selling carbon offsets under regulation changes

Featured News

Buyers (Bids)

Sellers (Offers)

Featured News

Factor	TiO₂ Results (First Set)	HM Results (Second Set)
Grade Range	10.1%–16.4% TiO₂	7.1%–26.3% HM
Intercept Thickness	16.4m–67.0m	16m–28m
Depth of Mineralization	From surface (0m) to ~40m	From 2m–29m
Highest Grades	16.4% TiO₂ over 6m	26.3% HM over 8m
Mining Potential	High-grade TiO₂ with thick intercepts	High-grade HM, but needs confirmation of TiO₂ content

Hello. The plain difference is below from two different...

Top Stories

Listen: HotCopper Wire Podcast 014 – Abu Dhabi wants to buy our 'true' oil and gas gem

Wednesday's HotCopper trends: DroneShield in Europe, Humm sale | June 25

ASX Market Close: Index flat as miners fall | June 25, 2025

Australia’s gas crisis is here – and dying coal plants aren’t helping

Delorean to begin selling carbon offsets under regulation changes

Featured News

Buyers (Bids)

Sellers (Offers)

Featured News