Ann: New High-Grade Zone Discovered at CV13 - 34.4m @ 2.90% Li2O, page-93

dont mind a good debate - and a score card.

@Helios11 "Everything i have pointed out is correct, and you and your mates are annoying me more. "

Let's see if that's true. The posts are getting longer and more tangential.

"I first pointed out phase 1 & 2 is bullcrap after watching that stupid youtube video".... "I found the technical document on sedar but not on asx. From that doc, DMS not valid for phase 1, as you have no met tests, phase 2 needs more testing."

That document is public and here on Patriot's website: https://patriotbatterymetals.com/corvette/ yes, great. but, my point was that its not on the ASX, so again disclosure - couldn't care less if its on the website. Helios 1 v Neo 0.

I shared with you info about head grades vs. recoveries here: https://hotcopper.com.au/threads/ann-final-2023-drill-hole-results-for-the-cv13-cv9-pegmatites.7938566/page-145?post_id=73535879

Head grades I plotted overlap the grades in the Phase 1 area. That exact area hasn't been tested, but data indicates recoveries will be similar. Remember, PMET recoveries at the same head grades are much higher than those of WR1. So if you're saying PMET will be flotation (unjustified and unproven many times in previous posts), WR1 certainly will be a flotation operation.
You can't submit a mining plan for phase 1 and say its DMS if you dont have the evidence to support it. Thats opinion that phase 1 will be amenable. . Opinions are like arseholes everyone has one.

PMT were told to complete further tests in the technical document including dilution of head grade, the head grade used for west end was 1.52%, compared with 1.12. Using 1.12% gives just over 50% recoveries and ergo reaching 800klt is problematic.

Comparing other companies who have diluted head grade is not a comparative, but god work again trying to deflect the main point.

What is the Main point here? Phase 1 area is not DMS amenable without specific evidence to support it. At this time PMT were informed to complete further testing and supplied a float design for that area.

Helios 2 - Neo 0



"Now you are going UG for Nova and its 5.8%. I am right, but you and your mates annoyed me."
You're saying this based on the broker report, not PMET data/statements. What if they decide to go open pit in the new zone in CV13 instead, and process very high grade ore from the beginning without UG mining. A large land package and resource means optionality, and Corvette certainly has that.

Yes, PMT data, ie technical report supports my view of west end cv5. Yes, you have a massive land package, but based on current broker report, which would have been discussed with management, UG with Nova blend and 5.8% recoveries means i was right. The future may be different with your land package, this is about disclosure, not the land or deposit.

I would score this one, as its a question. but its 2-0