Hi punter102,As we know, the Ni% vs Pd g/t correlation (R2 =...

Hi punter102,
As we know, the Ni% vs Pd g/t correlation (R² = 0.95) is importantly based on laboratory assays and is therefore predictable. Just reiterating, the visual estimates of % sulphides in the field made by the onsite geologists looking at the RC rock chips and DD diamond core, can be very subjective and their observations do not necessarily always align with the lab. assays % sulphides. In my view, this became apparent in the initial holes drilled by GSR/CNJ where the field observations of % sulphide were optimistic when later compared with the lab. assayed % sulphides.

Congratulations to the GAL team for finding nickel sulphides well north of the initial Callisto discovery. Wishing you the best with the lab. assays. I'll update the plot below when GAL's new assays are released to the market. If you get lab. assays for Ni % in the 0.3 - 0.5 range, you can see where the Pd (g/t) results will plot. Good luck.


Kind regards OldGeo