OldGeo - your statement:"the visual estimates of % sulphides in...

OldGeo - your statement:

"the visual estimates of % sulphides in the field made by the onsite geologists looking at the RC rock chips and DD diamond core, can be very subjective and their observations do not necessarily always align with the lab. assays % sulphides"

seems to offer a great escape clause for incompetent logging. The mismatch at GSR/CNJ seems colossal to me. To your knowledge, what are the approximate odds of such a mismatch e.g. extremely rare, very rare, not uncommon, common etc, and other things being equal, does it come down to the experience and competence of the geologist doing the logging?

In a way, I hope that the answer to the second part is yes, as I have a good degree of trust in the quality of Brad's team, which then to me reduces the likelihood of facing a similar scale of mismatch when GAL's assays come in.

Tricky questions about your profession and I hope you feel able to reply.