hi
here are my calcs. my figures are different.
firstly the ann today said Michigan equipment added .6 gwh, so the original is 1.2 GWh not 1.
$450 at 70% of 1.2 is 0.84gwh capacity.
then $655 is 67%. of 1.8 not 55 IMO.
total revenue from 1.8 extrapolated at $us973
mns has 63% of us973 = aud 1260 which is $793m
x pe of say 5 gives a mc of 4b aus. roughly 2b per GWh.
these are all annual figures. I went back to the source of the 450m contracts. they appear to be per year. all references incl GWh are per year. please show me where it says otherwise.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- MNS
- Ann: New York Battery Plant Annual Capacity Increased - 1.8GWh
Ann: New York Battery Plant Annual Capacity Increased - 1.8GWh, page-69
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 68 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
LU7
Discover the strong preliminary feasibility of the Bécancour Lithium Refinery, showcasing resilience in a low pricing environment and a strategic plan to capitalize on future price recoveries
NEWS
Breakthrough programs slash healthcare events, driving a significant A$1.8M+ annual revenue boost
Add MNS (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
4.2¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $50.37M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
LU7
Discover the strong preliminary feasibility of the Bécancour Lithium Refinery, showcasing resilience in a low pricing environment and a strategic plan to capitalize on future price recoveries
MNS (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable