I see what you mean. I agree, it's a tad messy. Without wanting to be pedantic, the difference between 80 and 90% is significant ie "about three-quarters vs damn near all of em".
On checking: (my emphasis)
- I see that the page https://www.nextscience.com/the-problem/ says "While approximately 10% of bacteria are free floating, the remaining 90% naturally form colonies called biofilms.55"
- and "Just 10-20% of a wound biofilm is composed of microorganisms with the other 80–90% comprising EPS.8"
- and page https://www.nextscience.com/where-biofilms-exist/ says "According to the US National Institutes of Health, biofilms account for over 80 percent of microbial infections in the human body.18 "
So I think the answer is, they have taken the liberty of interpreting references 55, 8 and 18, as basis for a fair call in the prospectus of 90%. Reasonable, I suppose.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Ann: Next Science Investor Presentation May 2019
I see what you mean. I agree, it's a tad messy. Without wanting...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 4 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add NXS (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
24.0¢ |
Change
0.015(6.67%) |
Mkt cap ! $70.00M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
22.5¢ | 24.5¢ | 22.5¢ | $15.37K | 65.99K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 36776 | 24.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
25.0¢ | 3501 | 2 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 36776 | 0.240 |
1 | 149869 | 0.230 |
1 | 2371 | 0.225 |
1 | 75904 | 0.220 |
1 | 6500 | 0.215 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.250 | 3501 | 2 |
0.260 | 16371 | 2 |
0.270 | 20000 | 1 |
0.275 | 12350 | 1 |
0.290 | 8000 | 1 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 12/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
NXS (ASX) Chart |