Ann: Nicanda West (P66) - Positive Results, page-26

'I've given my best "guesses" and if they are wrong/disappointing to you, so be it.'

No you haven't. That was not your best. We have all seen your best. Almost everyday on the SYR and other graphite threads.

What you did is post something that completely ignores what has been discussed in Graphite siberia thread for close to 2 years. You and I have been talking - right? You - the person who forgets nothing. Always posting links to your previous posts when another poster comes remotely close to the subject matter of what you previously posted. Reminding everyone what you have said before in a prior post. Said it first. Reminding everyone what you have said in the past again and again.

So you don't get to dismiss this as me being upset at your 'amature geek opinion' not being good enough for me. You're Prime-ing it TJ - doing a deflect with dribble that ignores our HISTORY.

I am dissapointed in your post. Because you are person that reminds everyone everyone of your previous yet you come here and post something that completely ignores my previous posts.

Not consistent. In congruent. I hate that.

Do you remember the way you reacted when Jaded commented that all you do is post url links - you remember your reaction? I do. You were essentially insulted that people didn't read your posts - or was it that after having read your posts they incorrectly came to the wrong conclusion that all you do is post other people's url links.

I am dissapointed because in your post you mention GK as the inventor of spherical. Yes 'technically' youre right. But where is your acknowledgement that AMG Mining owns GK? Started buying it up close to 10 years ago and moved to 100% more recently. GK IS NOW AMG.

I'm dissapointed that you say GK are dummies that didn't patent. I've explained this to you in siberia often. So without going and posting a link to my previous posts - one very PLAUSIBLE explanation is that you don't patent something if you want it to GROW. If GK had patented then everyone using spherical would have to pay them a license fee. More IMPORTANTLY by NOT patenting every other super geek has come along and poached their IP and refined spherical such that it is now an emerging LARGE market - this would not have been possible with patents. Geeks are poor. They can't pay license fees.

Although you don't have to agree with my patent point - you cannot IGNORE my reasoning or explanation in previous posts like you did above by calling GK dummies. You have READ IT before in Siberia. And given the way you react when people 'forget' your previous posts and how quick you are to REMIND them - you are not ALLOWED to respond to my post by saying you don't read my stuff.

Not consistent. In congruent. I hate that.

I show you functionalised expanded G and you bring me SGL patents?

Again dissapointing. I'm guessing you googled functionalised expanded and it threw up a patent for you. Im also guessing you didn't know it could be functionalised until I pointed out to you.

Or do you have a post of yours you can point me to like you usually do with SYR posters?

And what response do you expect to your statement? Because SGL have a patent somehow Amg GK is locked out from getting one? Somehow it's likely that the dummies who invented spherical and forgot to patent haven't invented a new method of functionalising expanded graphite and simply forgotten to patent that as well.

Of course i cant prove antyping. Its analysis. GERO. GK don't file patents when they invent things TJ. So even if they invented a new method for functionalising we won't know about it - they have a REPUTATION for not patenting -remember?

Very dissapointed indeed. There we're so many interesting discussion points you and I could have teased out but theres no point doing so with someone who seems to have selective amnesia.

Regards and smiley faces. Add a wink or 2 for good measure.