Attitudes some simple questions if we all shared your views towards management do you think the second performance milestone would have been rejected? Do you also think the soft performance shares proposed last year would have been retracted? Do you think the conference call would have occurred without the pressure for more transparency? You have literally never questioned managments intentions before, instead you claim them to be saints if we all were living in that world management would be grabbing shares left right and centre whilst also keeping shareholders in the dark im sorry but you are so blatantly biased towards management there is hardly any objectivity in your posts, like the boy who cried wolf.
I hold 5+mill shares so im on the same team, i have talked up management from day one but their actions in the past 2 years or so has caused me to change my sentiment, we are experiencing a paradigm shift in the structure of the company as we are heading into the commercialisation phase and the current board is clearly not the A team required to tackle that; hence the new blood.
I applaud the team here on hotcopper, we have caused some real change. Its a beautiful thing when a small minority group with similar goals band together to make big change special thanks to JTA of course.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- WFL
- Ann: Nicotinamide Penetration Study
Ann: Nicotinamide Penetration Study, page-72
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 32 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add WFL (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
0.3¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $1.478M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
WFL (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable