BUD was always established to enrich DM at the expense of shareholders. If he was genuine (and competent) about running a successful company he wouldn't have done the dodgy backdoor listing in the first place.
One of my key learnings from this in relation to start-ups and backdoor listings is to assess:
1. Whether the founders are receiving reasonable commercial consideration through initial listing/cap raise, and
2. Whether the founders are manipulating themselves into an excessively large equity position to effectively silence shareholders
Buddy had negative equity at the time of the reverse takeover (much like today), yet consideration of $50,000,000 was paid (plus performance rights).
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Ann: Non Cash Impairment
BUD was always established to enrich DM at the expense of...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 52 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)