Does the company have to give the note holder permission to utilize the 15% capacity ? when exceeding the floor price of approved note terms ? Or was that an excess after the event of the note holder eroding the collateral shares. ?
were they in what manner appraised of, or monitoring the drain on collateral shares ?
Anyone on speaking terms with Brian want to get a please explain ?
Because we all know what happened next. No halt, and train wreck.
By whatever means, the note holder surely would have to give advice to the company of its conversions ? Or the registry give notice of movement of stock from either new issue or collateral share movement ?
And when that was below 1.5c, a halt and CR should have curtailed this train wreck to 0.4c ?
I dont know the answer to these, and why there is a ??
Does the company have to give the note holder permission to...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 78 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add AAU (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
0.3¢ |
Change
-0.001(25.0%) |
Mkt cap ! $2.989M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.4¢ | 0.4¢ | 0.3¢ | $3.51K | 1.003M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 44 | 47773044 | 0.3¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 0.4¢ | 15589614 | 17 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 05/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| AAU (ASX) Chart |