Ann: Non Renounceable Rights Issue Prospectus, page-24

So the admixture is worthy? Make up your mind. You literally have been telling everybody nobody needs mwcnts in concrete.

"Nobody is interested in either product. They are expensive solutions looking for non-existent problems. The clean up/potential hazard problem is a total show stopper. If equipment can't be hosed out and waste water poured on the ground then the product is totally impractical"

You have more or less admitted that there is a concerted effort to drive EDE down tell the break.

"Eventually (long after EDE has gone broke) CNT will be cheap enough to use as an admixture for certain applications.

So now it is only the cost of CNTs is stopping this product from being successful.

And of course, patent law is pretty loose and free when it comes to reverse engineering patented products and processes.
"Patents don't provide 'protection'. They merely allow companies to sue for loss or damages. It takes an average of USD3 million and five years to defend a patent in US courts."
And stop lights don't stop people - but most know it would be stupid to try.

You can't even keep up with your own script.
"There are hundreds of different (and possibly better) methods for dispersing CNT. Nobody needs to copy Edencrete."