Your approach is too simplistic. If there was one big concrete...

  1. 1,447 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 1251
    Your approach is too simplistic. If there was one big concrete plant for all of Australia, and it was located near the magic mud mine, then it might be economically viable. That's assuming the concrete producers' capex and opex risks were low enough to justify risking the ROI.

    As for the concrete property improvements, are they significantly above the standard error for the control group, enough to justify changing production methods? I've seen other companies reports for the magic mud. The economics vanish with shipping distance. Yea, sure, your magic mud has extra special properties. Probably unlike anything seen anywhere else. LOL. Truth is its just clay, and there just isn't enough market close by to be economical.

 
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)
Last
5.7¢
Change
-0.002(3.39%)
Mkt cap ! $109.0M
Open High Low Value Volume
6.0¢ 6.1¢ 5.7¢ $163.8K 2.822M

Buyers (Bids)

No. Vol. Price($)
2 10070 5.7¢
 

Sellers (Offers)

Price($) Vol. No.
5.8¢ 134018 1
View Market Depth
Last trade - 16.10pm 31/07/2025 (20 minute delay) ?
ZEO (ASX) Chart
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.