It was interesting to see that for the first time(I think) the directors have mentioned the possibility of an administrator being appointed if resolution 1 isn't passed
prudent that they should do that as it must now be a distinct possibility
regardless of the buyers credentials one could assume that IF the buyer had substance then AZZ would have commenced legal action for the buyer to complete "an unconditional " contract
so either there were conditions OR it is pointless taking legal action against a $2 company
will AZZ now relist as the buyer has been disclosed?
I suspect not as AZZ directors would not wish to see what the sp might do prior to the meetings being held
once the dust settles this case/example might find its way into a university commerce degree textbook...but not sure yet as to what the topic might be!
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- AZZ
- Ann: Noteholder Notice of Meeting
Ann: Noteholder Notice of Meeting, page-45
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 72 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add AZZ (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
CC9
CHARIOT CORPORATION LTD
MD - Shanthar Pathmanathan, Geologist - David Trabert
MD - Shanthar Pathmanathan
Geologist - David Trabert
SPONSORED BY The Market Online