Why put money into something that is not moving and risky when...

Interesting what you say that those investments have strengthened the company. They are not the best assets to have acquired and you should perhaps look behind the scenes and who [and related parties] got what out of it. If they were good the share price would be higher. The arbitration has nothing to do with these assets, so if anything then its an indication of the value of them as the share price is not moving becasue of them.

Why put money into something that is not moving and risky when other things are moving, less risky and not politcal. Things will change in time with ETM for the better [wouldn't be here otherwise] and the benefits will come but just not in the next 6 months. Yes Management could be better but you need different management skills for different stages for a company's growth and success.

You have to look at the company as a whole. If things dont work out in Greenland, you want to hope these other assets improve the share price from where it is and more importantly management have the skills to do so.