Lopez thanks for the response, but not sure I follow the logic:
1) If someone makes an offer the acquirer needs cash not VLA (just as a note they have 40M and the ability to raise 30M without the provision). To defend versus a takeover some companies use poison pills, but isn't their strategy to get acquired or create a license deal. In a takeover the shareholders need to approve, so not sure I am worried on a low ball offer.
2) If they goto phase three why not ask for the funds from the shareholders at that point? Again they have ~70M without the clause.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Ann: Notice of Annual General Meeting/Proxy Form-VLA.AX
Lopez thanks for the response, but not sure I follow the logic:...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 3 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
NEWS
Antler Copper Project hits major permitting milestone – air quality permit advances to final review