I would think so, we’d be swapping one for another.
I can understand the other resolutions (more money for directors because they think they’re doing a good job) but the termination payment has be worried. Why the need to change it? They must be expecting mgmt changes. That might be good if, for example, they expect new investors to come into board positions and therefore replace an existing board member. But I think it’s more sinister. There has to be a reason for this change and I’d love to know what it is.