although I’m not overly concerned by this clause I feel it brings zero value to shareholders. Allowing a takeover bid of 75% of the shares and not the full 100% means the bidder doesn’t have to pay a premium for the full control of the company. It also means that the remaining 25% of the shares get stuck in being minority holdings.
this clause isn’t unusual by any means but I just don’t see it bringing any advantages to current shareholders.
Ann: Notice of Annual General Meeting/Proxy Form, page-16
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 69 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add NRZ (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
0.3¢ |
Change
-0.001(25.0%) |
Mkt cap ! $6.543M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.4¢ | 0.4¢ | 0.3¢ | $906 | 257.6K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 28 | 36553921 | 0.3¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 0.4¢ | 42030498 | 16 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 12/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| NRZ (ASX) Chart |