Ann: Notice of Annual General Meeting/Proxy Form, page-264

First 264 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
aniesbaswedan

6,681 Posts.

1545

14/07/20

20:11

Post #: 45863819
Share
Originally posted by aes411: ↑

I put it to ego. And it's because of JK's attitude/ego that I'm happy to continue investing in this company. I want the company run by a bold CEO with a different view of the future than the monopolistic incumbents. Will he be successful? Time will tell.

Why have the past nine or so months been wasted trying to investigate a milestone matter that was discussed, explained, agreed on - whilst keeping the company's shares suspended? It doesn't make any sense to me except the ASX is on to something fishy - which I suspect but can't prove. What is even being investigated that warranted suspending the shares in the first place? I'm still confused... after 9 months.

Were the shares suspended for volatility due to the revenue dispute OM report? Clearly not - as the first round of questioning had little (or nothing) to do with that matter. IMO that's just smokescreen for ASX's nefarious intentions.
Were the shares suspended to prevent directors from selling? Clearly not as the ASX is not interested in the escrow offer and the directors haven't sold these shares despite having several opportunities to do so, and at very significant profits.
Were the shares suspended for breaching listing rules? Clearly not, otherwise the ASX should have pointed these breaches out back then and should not have released the announcements at the time; the ASX is just trying to be pedantic and creative here. Rule 18.7 can be used to suspend virtually any company at anytime the ASX so chooses, so fairness in application of the rule is critical.

So why were the shares? I'm still searching for answers... after 9 months.

Expand

Additionally, if ISX truly believes that the suspension was unfair and truly intend to get relisted then why not proceed with the original court case instead of pursuing damages? Why pursue damages knowing that the court case is guaranteed to get delayed? Logically speaking, any damage claim could have been done contingent to ISX winning the original case. So why?
Last edited by aniesbaswedan: 14/07/20

ISX Price at posting: $1.07 Sentiment: None Disclosure: Not Held
3 Upvote

0 Great analysis

Reply

Top Stories

TBN

Tamboran kicks off Shenandoah South pilot project with SS-2H well spud

HVN

Consumers cautious according to Harvey Norman, as profit slumps 35% in FY24

CYM

WA Nifty copper project steps closer to restart with Cyprium Metals inking $40M loan from Glencore

HLX

Helix investor makes partial takeover bid, proposing board changes

LLC

Lendlease sells off US east coast construction operations in latest global divestment push

Consumer Staples Shine Amid Retail Slump – Key Stocks to Watch

CCO

The Calmer Co’s Anthony Noble reflects on record breaking FY24

Week 35 Wrap: HotCopper’s top watched; ‘iron ore winter’ has started; Oz inflation @ 3.5% MoM; Harris fracking flip

VYS

Vysarn acquires Waste Water Services Pty Ltd for $7.5M; WWS to become subsidiary as expansion continues

PYC

PYC achieves key designation for drug aiming to treat blinding eye disease ADOA