What I am saying here is that APG has forced shareholders to consider the future of the company in relation to the past.
Is it better to think that the company can promise a better future or does the company hold the same history as the director's have always indicated in the past.
There is nothing forced against shareholders, only the future as indicated by the past.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- APG
- Ann: Notice of Annual General Meeting/Proxy Form
Ann: Notice of Annual General Meeting/Proxy Form, page-28
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 13 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)