Or alternatively don't deliver and next year have performance rights for the same thing as this year just like they are the same as last year, only with lower target prices.
Out of curiosity, was anybody actually consulted last year after the AGM about renumeration? I find it difficult to imagine who actually fedback that we were happy with renumeration and it was all about Kwinana.
Also curious if anybody knows which companies were used for the renumeration comparison or if anybody has actually seen the report? Our obvious comparator RNU doesn't use performance rights for NED and seems to align performance rights to management with the relative performance of the company so i can only presume they weren't compared to RNU. I wonder who they were compared to?
Ann: Notice of Annual General Meeting/Proxy Form, page-14
Add EGR (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
9.9¢ |
Change
-0.001(1.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $44.94M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 10.0¢ | 10.0¢ | 9.8¢ | $21.04K | 210.6K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 101282 | 9.8¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 10.5¢ | 6000 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 15.52pm 23/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| EGR (ASX) Chart |