This is my interpretation of Resolution 4.
AU mining appears to be only lending MRC $800k for 6 days (when MRC is expected to increase its ownership to 90% in the Munglinup Graphite project) along with paying the $200k for the cost to establish the loan. the costs to establish the loan seem excessive = 25% fee.
The total value of the shares being issued is worth $1.22mil. How is this in the best interest of shareholders?
If MRC had the right to borrow the funds from AU mining for 12 months at 15% interest, the total amount payable would be around $920k. We could borrow the funds for AU mining for 2-3 years based on this interest rate and still not get to the cost of the $1.22 mil worth of shares that MRC is seeking approval from shareholders.
If my assessment is correct, I will be voting against this resolution, I would much prefer to borrow the funds rather than pay 61mil shares within 10 days of shareholders approving the placement.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- MRC
- Ann: Notice of Annual General Meeting
Ann: Notice of Annual General Meeting, page-2
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 10 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add MRC (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
2.6¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $25.59M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
MRC (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable
The Watchlist
SER
STRATEGIC ENERGY RESOURCES LIMITED
David DeTata, Managing Director
David DeTata
Managing Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online