IF people don't get bonuses they MIGHT leave and it COULD...

IF people don't get bonuses they MIGHT leave and it COULD jeopardise the timing of the hand-over?

Yeah well I guess I COULD live with that risk. We can contract out the work for a few weeks if needed.

And the people affected SHOULD have taken into account the sovereign risk factors, and PROBABLY did so while looking at the potentially big rewards on offer. They played the same game we all did. And the risk didn't work out. Now they want paying of bonuses, despite it all falling down. Out of my pocket.


If shareholders don't get rewards, they SHOULD'NT either. Full stop. Period.

NO to anything but the sale, and the re election of Amber for me.