They do not owe the company $2.15m. They owe the company $150k.
The company claim they spent $1m defending the S249F action - I believe much of this was unnecessary - the Directors chose to do so. This amount is clearly not owed by Vitrinite.
A further $1m is required to sort out some issues relating to the Queensland assets. Sounds like the board did not do their due diligence- very sloppy of the board and this has cost shareholders money. I believe the current CEO was board chairman at the time of the acquisition.
If the board believes that Vitrinite behaved fraudulently or broke any terms of the purchase contract then the board should pursue this in the courts. They have not indicated they plan to do so.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Ann: Notice of Extraordinary General Meeting/Proxy Form
They do not owe the company $2.15m. They owe the company...
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 89 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add X64 (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
57.0¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $129.8M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
X64 (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable
The Watchlist
BM8
BATTERY AGE MINERALS LTD
Nigel Broomham, CEO
Nigel Broomham
CEO
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online