you are very selective with your views. You tend to omit the...

you are very selective with your views. You tend to omit the views of the Young Family at 15% who have know GC for a very long time - dont you think its strange that they want him gone as well ? ex business partners & his son who runs a division inside SEQ. Then throw in the chairman - why do you think JL wants GC gone ? Forget all the SC legal case - you have both the ex chairman of the board + the largest shareholder wanting GC gone - this cant be ignored. Their reasons will come out.

if you want a view on GC ask the ex CEO (he knifed) the ex CFO (on a NDA), advice management or the long list of employees sacked because they didn't agree with GC. Do your homework

Acorn vote will be interesting but I cant see how they cant be conflicted given SEQ own units in their funds & Acorn own shares in SEQ