Ann: Notice of General Meeting/Proxy Form , page-19

as pointed out before:

Voting on sale of ML occurs before spill motion voting

So - if the guys seeking the spill motion can't be bothered to contact SH with their intentions and communicate clearly how they see the future and progress at BCN:

Will they be any better than current management who has also kept us in the dark and not followed thru' on time-lines and promises ?

I would have thought to get to their goal they would have to clearly spell out their plans to SH in a letter to be able to "change the RMS contract" as this is voted on well before the spill motion