samwiise, you got a good memory. well done. on the BRR Brad was...

samwiise, you got a good memory. well done. on the BRR Brad was abit
coy about the direction change TON has taken from Gold to Graphite, what
I got out of it was the direction was taken to do what TON needed (Brad's
words) and that was to raise funds because the MAT farm-in's was all
done during this make change shift, dont forget the Grafex project was introduced by Canaccord via their assumed raising at 10c. Without having seen the change in substantial holding, I am too pretty convinced Jenks is part of the first batch initial aud 500,000 support at 5c because a new
rear mirror of a mazerazzi cost more than the largest parcel of the SPP lol

I also found it very interesting Brad mentioned other minerals.. and you
know what - not a word of the vanadium mica on the Balama tenements.

As for his Graphene views he need to look up what the patent discussion
is doing because graphene had a 28 metric tonnes production in 2010.

graphite's future remain in the steel and manufactoring industries, forget
the Li-on batteries and graphene hype.

and oh, the purer the product you can produce the less toxic chemical
is required in the intermediate process of producing graphene. Tests
has shown that only after heat treatment and further compression in
casts does the conductivity and stenght increase - any compression
does break the edges of graphite hence the smaller the crystal the
less breakage.

just of those things again.