I am also perplexed as to why they would not call a vote on the mine acquisition.
As I understand it tabling this at the AGM would satisfy the voting rule. However, leave the free-float, and information to the market rule unfulfilled. Presumably providing the market with sufficient information to make an informed decision is not a real issue so it must be the free-float. Therefore, they will have to go through the expense and hassle of an EGM whilst presumably still being diluted by the free-float requirements??? I presume there must be some maneuvering that I am to naive to see that works in their favour.......... does anyone have any thoughts?
Do these requirements have to be synchronous in some way?
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Ann: Notice of General Meeting/Proxy Form
I am also perplexed as to why they would not call a vote on the...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 12 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add RRP (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
1CG
ONE CLICK GROUP LIMITED
Mark Waller, MD
Mark Waller
MD
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online