Their rates of evaporation are lower than expected so there are less accumulated salts.
They plan on bringing forward sustaining capital and changing pond layouts.
The more important question is how did they get the rates wrong. Is this an easy and unfortunate mistake to make or does it reflect the rapid “fast track” feasibility work that underpins this project?
Their rates of evaporation are lower than expected so there are...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 76 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)