The board of directors answer to the shareholders and they are there to act in the best interest of shareholders. Why would you recommend acceptance of a T/O given we have been provided no explanation as to why it is a good deal for us and why entertain the condition of providing RMS control with 50.1% as a minmun. if this were to happen I can guarantee, the current board won't be hanging around and BRB shareholders be shafted. RMS will do what's best in the interest of their shareholders in relation to BRB.
Secondly at the very least before I consider my oprions I would expect the board to initiate an in independant report in relation to the T/O as to whether it is fair and reasonable.
This board has been nothing but misleading and a spineless self interested lot.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- BRB
- Ann: Notice received s203D(2) and s249F of the Corporations Act
Ann: Notice received s203D(2) and s249F of the Corporations Act, page-27
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 143 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add BRB (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
INF
INFINITY LITHIUM CORPORATION LIMITED
Ryan Parkin, Managing Director & CEO
Ryan Parkin
Managing Director & CEO
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online