Some of you guys need to take some time to consider the context...

Some of you guys need to take some time to consider the context before just replying like a autobot. The entire context of my series of posts is not whether BUD is a worthy investment or not. Clearly I believe it is a worth investment regardless of the lack of it being revenue positive nor paying dividends. The context of my posting is simply about the blind diety worship in this guy called Dave that founded and runs this company that we're all hoping will go on to achieve positive revenue and pay a share of its earnings to its shareholders.

If you want to try and cut down my argument, at least start with addressing the actual argument instead of inventing another one in your mind just because that's the only one you know you're better equipped to counter.