personally, I have never been a fan of Bell Potter and their analyst reports
who i spoke to actually became hyper-defensive and declined to answer my questions
he/she just said: "that is the way we see it"
naturally i won't mention their name. i would not want to be sued
if Bell Potter are so great, why aren't they pushing TON?
if TON was so great, why doesn't it have 'institutional investors'?
you are arguing double standards in your posts
Ann: Notice under section 708A(5), page-67
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 19 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
