Nailed it with the below Sam"My issue is with James Garner...

Nailed it with the below Sam

"My issue is with James Garner turning this into a lifestyle company with bonuses and oppis before performance"

I have remarked on a couple of posts of mine how my faith in the company was all because of the comment CG made in her first interview, after joining, how her expertise was in mitigating trial risk given you may only get one shot , so I am still in shock myself with how bad the p2b result is given the prior result, guven her skill set and past experience at CSL. She does not strike .me as being someone who would have missed having ducks lined up from the start and so I wonder if she is as confused as some of us on the result ......

but I was always a little worried when JG joined and I read comments from posters about his prior company experiences and I sadly agree that in my opinion , you have nailed it with those 3 lines, which I myself have also said a few times... I can not, for the life of me, understand why him and AF got those bonuses pre instead of post successful results only.

Anyway, I am down the lot so there goes a new car for the wife, an early retirement for her, following her a stroke last year, and the investment my sons made, but I have told them not to sell.out and to just put their holdings in a bottom draw as they have plenty of time in hand in case we see a miraculous turnaround in company fortune in the future

dave