Ann: Notices received under S203D and S249D of Corporations Act, page-58

Gassy with all due respect did you not make a promise to not post in this forum until such time as the challenge was over

So much for your word lol

So today i had decided to keep my opinions to myself Gassy on this one, but being as you have engaged once more then i will give you my opinion as a rebutal with regards to you thinking i should change my tune

Tell me Gassy why should i or why should this purchase change my tune

Yes i respect the purchase it was very admirable of him to do what he has done but i still dont see how that changes anything

If anything at this moment in time, and things could well change, but as of todays Ann it just shows how alone our CEO is in the investment world

It tells me that he does not have the backing a CEO should have in the Company he is vested in,

We have seen today on these boards his purchase has inspired some on this forum even you you yourself come out baiting me with your ill chosen words once more for no reason whatsoever

This guy doubled Mark Diamonds salary in a year a guy you would hear no wrong said about
Yet at the first opportunity given on failure and really mere hearsay you turn and cast your stones on the guy LOL

James Garner has backed himself in agreed, but on his Salary, when you consider the $190k bonus plus what he will gain if he manages to keep his seat along with future earnings bonuses and further issue of oppis

I think gassy this purchase by no means pocket change by any standard,

will be rather insignificant over the next 10 years if he survives these challenges on the return he will pull back in over such a term

Plus he has purchased on market so he has the shares

What have the liquid events been since our trial failed

we had the huge sell of opportunistic buying to the down side could have been anyone purchasing our major backer being Platinum lost faith and funds and bailed no problem they do what they had to do

since that time we have seen our first challenge come along and buying on market did they do this to back in our existing board no they did not

Then we have PVL come along and have now shown their hand after purchasing over 100 mil are they backing this existing board in no they are not

Now we have our CEO coming to market and purchasing 39, mil shares on market impresive yes

But let me ask each and everyone of you here on this forum, had these events not taken place would James Garner have made this substantial purchase

Yes i will say again it is an admirable statement and i take my hat of to the guy but in my eyes all this has done is show that he cannot call upon the funding required when it is most needed

Do i really want to move forwards with such support from the market that is what each and everyone on here should be asking themselves looking to the future

how many on here are going to go out over these next few days weeks and months and match James Garner $ for $

Because this is the on market purchasing that we should be looking towards not a one off by an individual in survival mode

James will not carry this future investment forwards on his own backing, he will be reliant upon the market he may have inspired some retail in here but its not retail that have to be inspired

IS IT GASSY

on saying the above i did not want to rain on anyones parade her today especially James Garners in light of this recent gesture

but once again Gassy you bait me by your nonesensical post and actually do more harm than good to the forum than you would have done by keeping your word and staying away untill such time as the vote was over

I think i answered your question Gassy perhaps you could post more content on why i should change my tune

and i stick by what you highlighted yes the future does look very very bleak indeed for us all at this moment in time