Ann: Notification regarding unquoted securities - A2M, page-7

I'm not against performance rights as per se. In fact I would prefer that at least 50% of remuneration package was performance rights. But in this particular case 20% eps growth over the next 3 years is a joke. From 10.8cps it will give you just 18.6 cps whereas in the previous 3 years it was 52, 39 and 27cps. Revenue growth from a smaller base for the next three years 6, 8, 10% after 30-50% in previous years? And after that they are still consider themselves as a growth company and paying huge bonuses? I understand that this is minimum, but I do not think they should get millions of shares for such minimum. I wouldn't mind to give them double of that if in 3 years time they can beat previous year record. But this is just ...