believe what you want i'd say.... we know first samuel bought 5m...

believe what you want i'd say.... we know first samuel bought 5m at $0.025, we know they've now bought approx another 14m at $0.02 avg, and we know they've tipped in another $5m at $0.014.

what you can't prove is that any other insto's were selling their own shares, rather than the possibility it was their clients selling their shares....

you think that nsl really encouraged or disclosed info to insto's to sell down, when first samuel had just given them $5m at $0.025??? And first samuel are happy enough about being shafted that they've again tipped in more money? i'm pretty sure your arguments are contradicting themselves...