May I politely point out Fengel that Rykster was not the first...

May I politely point out Fengel that Rykster was not the first person to engage in ad hominem criticisms. After all i was labelled a pedant in a rather snarky reply to my observation which queried why on earth, if you were so well researched on OGC and Didipio, you would fail to spell the mine's name correctly.
It does tend to raise a question mark about how much care you put into your research.

Which reminds me to ask. If both you and Rykster have come to the conclusion that OGC is such a terrible, ignorant, and bulldozer mentality company then why do you hold shares in OGC ? Surely if you are morally affronted by the environmental desecration that you claim to have found in your research then you would be dumping your involvement with the company.
That would be logical to me.