Man, don’t go parading your opinion around like it’s gospel...

Man, don’t go parading your opinion around like it’s gospel truth. You’re throwing out claims you have zero evidence to back up. Show me the receipts—where’s the proof Trafalgar Capital had the holding before this event, and where’s the trail showing they bailed after? Spoiler alert: You don’t have it because you’re making it up and passing it off as fact.

And honestly, if they were already sitting on those shares, why would they hold off just to dump them on meeting day? They’d have known about the shortfall well beforehand—after all, they had to step in to take them up. Your logic doesn’t hold water, my friend.

Wow, quite surprising to see such a strong uptake of the SPP! Honestly didn’t expect it to be this high—holders shelled out $690k at 1 cent a share, even when cheaper options were available on the market. That says a lot about the confidence and potential they see here.

Now, about those shortfall shares being "immediately dumped"—what’s your source for that? If it’s just your personal take, you might want to preface it with "imo" to avoid confusion. Stating opinions as facts can be misleading.

Here’s the thing: 42 million shares were traded on the 11th, same day as the meeting results, but the shortfall shares weren’t even allocated yet—and still haven’t been. So, factually speaking, it doesn’t quite add up that those specific shares were dumped.

It’s definitely an interesting situation. Looks like there are some solid holders in the top 20 or so who are genuinely invested in seeing the company thrive. The remuneration also seems pretty reasonable, which is refreshing. Normally, with companies like this, you’d expect hefty salaries draining the coffers while shareholders get left holding the bag. But here? Seems like everyone might actually be working toward the same goal.

Fascinating times ahead—think I’ll try to snag some at 0.006 if the opportunity pops up!