Ann: Operational Update and Board Changes, page-8

I believe it is positive news @seals, but then just about any change would have been given the chasm of ineptitude CCZ was falling into.

The stuff they are looking for - particularly Cobalt - is very technical, so having tech people at the top is an obvious choice, for been-counters to rely on consultants is hardly ever going to work - there is always a conflict of interest, as I quickly learned working for a consulting engineer to Governments.

That other one we are both waiting on for board changes is a little different, in that the top is full of geos, but decisions are made by 'independants'. I take that to mean the top will not sign off because of 10 years history of negative results, or, that there is basic disagreement, or, both. IMO we will know soon.

GL to the new Board of CCZ, I hope your hard work is fruitful and you enjoy the challenge.