Ann: Operational Update Graphene Production and Mining Activities, page-128

to myself

I made an error. I wrote 120 ppm. Its not its 1,200 ppm. So the FGR sample contained only half of the conc. of Mn oxidised GO. This strengthens the case for exploring for appropriate clean up process going-forward, but install a quality control process from mine face to use now anyway.

For now impurity level still might not matter in terms of the results from samples sent out, but there is room to improve when/if necessary. Implementation of QA now will at least start the process of more professional rigour esp. if you want top dollar.

(By comparison the Canada Carbon owned Miller Hydrothermal Lump/Vein Graphite Project in Alberta has 0.72 ppm after clean up, that is 99.9998% purity. Though this is nuclear quality, at least it shows a benchmark of what is possible. Grade and quality control is where FGR should be focussed to tailor output to specifi demands - why let the buyer do it and capture this part of the value chain? Maye many buyers want to do themselves, maybe others can't or won't.)
.