Why would a dual listing be needed if the MOUs were going ahead successfully ? Dual listing means another raise for SRN, if the MOUs were going ahead what would be the point of the dual listing, dual listing increases access to capital, which wouldnt be needed if MOUs were positive , seems "continued discussions with all the key stakeholders is positive .." might be a little dishonest.
Why would a dual listing be needed if the MOUs were going ahead...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 69 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add SRN (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
0.4¢ |
Change
-0.001(20.0%) |
Mkt cap ! $7.945M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.4¢ | 0.4¢ | 0.4¢ | $98.58K | 24.64M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 20 | 21844146 | 0.3¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 0.4¢ | 2948508 | 3 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 15.58pm 05/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| SRN (ASX) Chart |