If this was the case it does make sense to make the decision to move with the macro market . But does this mean the board intentionally bled out the business with excessive costs for the sole reason of aiding the open short positions? Theyve started to focus on cost cutting now but why now? Why not 12 months ago? Imo it's because lithium short was in full force and they understood there's more money to be made moving with the macro lithium ebb and flow. At the cost of the shareholder of course.But is there a potential lithium powerhouse here still?
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- LKE
- Ann: Operational Update
Ann: Operational Update, page-258
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 14 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add LKE (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
3.9¢ |
Change
-0.001(2.50%) |
Mkt cap ! $66.74M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
4.0¢ | 4.0¢ | 3.8¢ | $104.8K | 2.684M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
17 | 932597 | 3.8¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
4.0¢ | 673198 | 8 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
18 | 958136 | 0.038 |
8 | 708891 | 0.037 |
13 | 823798 | 0.036 |
19 | 1365953 | 0.035 |
13 | 1353267 | 0.034 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.040 | 588866 | 7 |
0.041 | 565000 | 3 |
0.042 | 1348932 | 9 |
0.043 | 778883 | 5 |
0.044 | 637680 | 6 |
Last trade - 14.57pm 04/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
LKE (ASX) Chart |